cy toks: Restructuring and Reforms

M&A - deal or no deal?

Dell hit the headlines of all business media recently with their proposed $67 billion takeover of EMC, making it one of the largest leveraged buyout deals in history. The chip-maker is not alone in the merger and acquisition (M&A) scene as Western Digital similarly announced a $19 billion deal to buy out SanDisk yesterday. With a slew of M&A activities happening, is this corporate action indeed useful for companies seeking growth beyond a certain critical mass?

It may be categorised that successful companies that derived growth from M&A focused on three key aspects:

Preserving or enhancing business momentum, particularly in organic growth
Executing more deals; through a systematic and disciplined approach to more deal discovery
Translating each deal into more top and bottom line growth

In order for a successful M&A to be executed, it first needs to be aligned with accelerating growth. While this sounds like common sense, identifying the deal archetypes and rationales marks a much complex affair. So what entails?

Expansion of customer base

This can help improve scale of offering, reach new geographies or refine value proposition from greater market share
Existing and new customer opportunities would be a crucial parameter
A classic example is the combination of various travel sites such as TripAdvisor and Expedia under the broad umbrella of IAC

Complementing gaps in product offerings

Undertaking a new company that addresses a gap in existing product or service offering helps strengthen value proposition and sharpens competitive edge
This is evident in Salesforce’s acquisition of Jigsaw to offer automated processes in its data collection processes

Speed to adjacency

It is common for companies (particularly Technology companies as it is a fast-evolving industry) to pursue M&A opportunities in adjacent markets to expand beyond their core offering
Adobe and Oracle for instance are serial adjacency acquirers where the key to success is the ability to understand core differentiators in targets

Successful M&A initiatives should be robust and build on the Group’s core business. The combination of organic and inorganic growth should align the deal rationale with companies’ pressing growth challenges. This inherently allows companies to survive amidst the dynamic and competitive industry landscapes and deliver shareholder value. Conversely, M&A can stifle or disrupt growth should integration fails or occurs episodically.

What do you say - deal or no deal?

No comments

, by CY

China

Two-sided perspective of the robust Chinese market

Following a 13.3% correction in the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index (SSE) this week, the largest weekly decline since 2008, headlines across major dailies now post phrases such as “drop amid fears of equity bubble” and “China sell-off intensifies”. The market sentiment has taken an almost 180 degree change from early June where the chatter was centred on SSE achieving 7-year highs and on track to chart new historical peaks.

While Part I of my article discussed about some of the key reasons that fuelled the rally in Chinese equities – expectations of easing, liquidity boost from government policies, asset rotation and margin-lending expansion are but some of the drivers. It is common knowledge that a euphoric market sentiment is one that should not be undermined.

The discussion on whether we are headed for an equity bubble bust or the correction in Chinese equities being a near-term phenomenon continues as we move on to analyse some of the pros and cons of a robust Chinese equity market.

Pros:

Occurrence of financial reform – As Chinese equity market is dominated by on-shore retail investors, asset rotation by means of channelling more household savings into equities helps reduce overall reliance of corporate funding on banks and shifts the burden onto the equity market.

Economic rebalancing towards consumption-led growth – The Chinese government has repeatedly signalled their intention to achieving a GDP growth of at least 7%, led by consumption. Driven by technology innovation and domestic consumption, the rally in the Chinese markets has certainly created wealth for most investors to fuel consumption.

Improving valuations facilitate corporate financing opportunities – Corporate debt to equity should decline going forward, reducing the economy’s reliance on debt financing and inherently lowers overall economic risk. The improving or rich valuations of companies will be prime for a series of corporate financing opportunities such as IPOs, secondary placements.

Encourage M&A opportunities to enjoy PE arbitrage – The comparatively higher PE multiple enjoyed by Chinese companies may be an advantageous weapon for them to carry out inorganic growth opportunities through M&A with a target on companies trading at much lower valuations and earnings accretive. This is opportunistic for companies seeking to expand vertically or horizontally across the supply chain.

Lower cost of funding – Particularly for the private sector, equity financing becomes a viable channel of financing as cost of funding becomes relatively cheaper. This helps ease the financial constraints experienced largely by small and medium-sized private companies.

Capital market liberalisation - The launch of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect is the first mutual market access initiative adopted by the Chinese government. While this has been instrumental in driving inflow of foreign funds into the Chinese equities, more importantly it is a step forward for China to move up the capital market value chain of becoming an international equity platform.

Cons

Potential equity bubble – Given that a large part of the rally in Chinese equities is driven by margin financing, which now stands at a towering US$350 billion, there is an underlying risk of defaults built by expectations and hype.

Contagion effect of rising margin debt to hurt banking system – While the margin debt of China seems manageable presently; it remains a risk as it links the banking system to stock market volatility. In order to fund loans to retail investors, brokers borrowed in the interbank market. As such, volatility in the market may cause defaults to occur and cause a chain reaction as the system is now more exposed to the brokerage industry.

Diversion of capital to equity market speculation – Although a somewhat less prevalent trend, there is observation that Chinese companies are diverting capital into the speculative equity market to generate quick and attractive returns. As these companies struggle with profitability from their core businesses in a slowing economy, this has been a strategy adopted by some. As a result, corporate profits become largely dependent on the equity market’s movement, hence affecting the volatility of earnings. In the event of a market reversal and a sluggish economy, earnings may suffer a double-blow.

Until more tangible consequences are experienced, the debate lingers about whether we are at the brink of an equity bubble bust or are we on the way to scale new highs. With no lack of positive takeaways from a robust market, it leaves little incentives for the market to head otherwise and this may be seen by Chinese regulators working their means to keep the outlined risks under control. The primary agenda for a bullish equity market remains that it will help facilitate structural reforms and revive the private sector to creating sustainable growth for China.

No comments

, by CY

Pages

cy toks

M&A - deal or no deal?

Two-sided perspective of the robust Chinese market

About CY

Translate

Labels

Popular Posts

Blog Archive